Showing posts with label Invalid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Invalid. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Christmas 2025 produces a mixed bag of modern postal history!

We always expect at the busy Christmas period there will be oddities in the mail.  No longer postmarks from Universal machines, but sometimes oddities of other sorts.

Of course the invalidation of the old Machin and country definitives has opened up more opportunities for Royal Mail Revenue Protection teams to show how they have been confused by management decisions and a lack of clear information.  

It is obvious that they need huge posters in the mail centres that can be seen from the other side of the room: then maybe individual operators would not refer so much to the RP teams, and the RP teams wouldn't find so many occasions to get it wrong.

Of course some just can't be bothered, hence this one was delivered in December 2025 - no date sadly - but it was, without postal markings or surcharge.  (And no, it wasn't hand delivered with the stamp just a decoration.) 


This one, on the other hand....  if you don't follow the GB new issues blogs (mine and Commonwealth Stamps Opinion) you might be forgiven for not recognising that this is a recently issued stamp.  

Sure, it looks a bit like the 5d one issued in 1970 but I doubt that anyone working as a postman now remembers that.   No, this has the head of King Charles on it and was issued on 27 November 2025. 

And here it is, used and processed through Birmingham Mail Centre on 18th(?) December 2025.  Three weeks and it's surcharged as being 'No Longer Valid for Postage', surely the quickest invalidation of any British stamp!  (My thanks to Not Bruce on Stampboards for this.)


If anybody has other examples of Christmas season madness, please email them to me for inclusion here.

 


Friday, November 7, 2025

Unusual surcharge label appears over two years after stamp invalidations

Following on from the previous post of an Antigua stamp being accepted through the mail at Sheffield Mail Centre, JW has sent this image from Reddit of a Christmas stamp being rejected by Royal Mail's Revenue Protection team somewhere.

Christmas 2010 1st class stamp declared invalid in 2025.

This one has a 2010 1st class Wallace & Gromit Christmas stamp which has been declared 'No Longer Valid for Postage'.  I'm hesitant to say that this label hasn't been reported before - I certainly can't recall it but surely it has been recorded somewhere?

Surcharge label with QR code - try it, it works!

Ironically, if Revenue Protection officers who applied this label had scanned the code it would have taken them to the Royal Mail app, specifically this page:

From the Royal Mail app Swap Out Scheme page

Whilst the 2010 stamp isn't shown, there is a Christmas stamp there.  Basically it's nonsense, incompetent and it's about time Revenue Protection sorted themselves out.  
 
And if they can't get it right, why should the general public?  
 
There are over 50 comments on that Reddit thread at least 7 users were telling everybody else, sometimes repeatedly, that all stamps had to have baarcodes.  One of the people putting them right was a postmaster however, so hopefully seven more people now know the true position.  Sadly none of them appear to work for Revenue Protection.

But back to the QR code - has anyone seen this before?

 


Wednesday, November 5, 2025

Aything goes - sometimes!

There is little distinctive now about Royal Mail's stamp issues to make them stand out from those of any other country - save that they have a tiny profile of the monarch's head on - and they aren't unique in that respect. 

Wildlife, comic-book heroes, film and tv franchises - not quite as prolific as Australia but many of these subjects have appeared from other stamp-issuing territories around the world. 

That's the only explanation for this escaping the attention of Revenue Protection officers.

Antigua & Barbuda $2 Star Trek stamp depicting Lt Sulu used at Sheffield Mail Centre 31/10/2025


Yes, it's StarTrek, marked 5 years ago by Royal Mail and covering the whole franchise which explains the omission of Lt Sulu from the set.  

But Sheffield Mail Centre happily passed this one through as if it was, what?  2nd class?  £2?  The British stamps didn't even have the name of the show on them, the only caption being to identify the characters.  

(Lest anyone thinks that inclusion of 'Great Britain' in the address means that it originated outside the UK, my correspondent assures me that it came from Goole.) 

But it's not the first, and won't be the last.  Last year (as shown on the other blog) Royal Mail - and possibly Post Office Ltd - accepted this set of WWF stamps - from Tristan da Cunha!


And we have previously been able to report this one from 2015 with a couple of stamp-on-stamps from St Helena, a pair of kestrels from the Falkland Is, and one Jersey stamp making the £1.41 rate - and cancelled at a post office branch in Rochdale.

With millions of mail items being processed daily of course some will slip through - that's how 60/70 years ago it was possible to have letters delivered bearing national insurance stamps, green shield trading stamps, and other non-postage stamps.

But there aren't so many now and the equipment is more sophisticated.  But really, one thematically illustrated postage stamp looks much like another.  70 years ago it wasn't worth charging postage due when it was only 6d and it cost more to collect it.  With 'Unpaid' charges now being astronomically higher, that argument doesn't apply.

But they are all fun to collect - let us know if you have any more,

 



Saturday, August 16, 2025

Some Royal Mail operatives still getting it wrong on validity.

It's been quite a long time since anybody reported having perfectly valid stamps declared invalid, and then two arrive almost together.  I think I can see why there might be confusion, but at by now, there shouldn't be.

The first one, from JR, had the 2007 1st class Lion for the World Cup 2007 Smilers Sheet, or MS; of course the similar definitive is no longer valid but.... 

The complaints process has been started! 

£2.50 surcharge on 1st class 'Wembley' Lion stamp, used July 2025.

The second, from IY, has the 2018 2nd class Christmas stamp.  It's pre-datamatrix (which started in 2021) but that doesn't matter, because in 2021 the 2nd & 1st class stamps were issued in both formats and both remain valid!  

In this case a refund of a booklet of 1st class stamps was 'paid out' by Royal Mail - but the customer is not only inconvenienced initially but then again in the effort to get a refund.

£2.50 surcharge on 2nd class 2019 Christmas stamp used May 2025.

Who else has had this problem this year?

It's sadly no surprise that there are more.  This one from CP shows the 175th Anniversary of the Penny Black 6 x 1st retail booklet, processed at Chester Mail Centre.  Unfortunately the yellow labels don't indicate where they were applied.  This time the stamp is identified as 'Counterfeit', rather than 'No Longer Valid'.  This seems like guesswork to me.

1d black 175th anniversary stamp mis-identified as Counterfeit

 

 

 


Tuesday, August 22, 2023

In the post after the Machin and Country definitives invalidation on 31 July 2023

My plan in this post is to show how Royal Mail treat items posted with the postage paid entirely or partly with recently invalidated stamps.  We know that a further unofficial grace period seems to have been granted in some areas for mail to work through the pipeline.  Given the staff shortages and resultant processing and delivery delays, this seems a wise move.

My plan at this stage is to show 

- examples of mail which should have been surcharged as it bears invalid stamps, but which has not;

- examples of mail correctly surcharged;

- examples of mail incorrectly surcharged (though not that which only has forged stamps on).


1. Mail which should have been surcharged.

a. Here's a 1st class Northen Ireland stamp (self-adhesive from a Smilers Sheet) used on 16 August in the Bristol Mail Centre area to Devon. (Thanks to RW).

Invalid 1st class Northern Ireland stamp posted 16 August 2023 not surcharged (should have been £1.10).

 

 b. My thanks to CP for sending this example of a 1st class Machin, processed by North & West Yorkshire Mail Centre on 9 August 2023.  Whilst one can understand the machine-processing of the Northern Ireland stamp above, hand-cancelling seems to suggest either that the message hasn't quite got through, or that some mail is going through because nobody can be bothered to apply the rules. 

Invalid 1st class Machin cancelled North & West Yorkshire 9 August 2023.

c. PA (see also section 2) sent this picture of a 2nd class letter posted with pairs of 10p & 20p barcoded stamps but with a cylinder block of Northern Ireland 2½p Machin regionals - which are no longer valid.  This was posted at the Castle Hedingham (Essex) Post Office on 1 August 2023 and processed through the SE Anglia Mail Centre in Chelmsford.

Combination cover with barcoded Machins and invalid Northern Ireland country stamps, with no surcharging, posted 1 August 2023.

d. This selection was not only accepted at the Post Office counter (sent by the Signed For service) but accepted all the way through the system and delivered without surcharge. (Branch and addressee details not known.)  I don't know the details but there is potentially £8.38 of postage here (only £4.63 valid) neither of which makes a valid postage rate.

Scottish Parliament sheet containing invalid country definitives accepted at the Post Office and delivered without surcharge. (Date believed to be August 2023).

e. (4 October)  This letter posted to Canada at a Southampton branch office has only the Machin World 20g rate stamp, and was not surcharged at Southampton mail centre - although we have seen other examples from Southampton MC which valid stamps which have been incorrectly surcharged.

Worldwide 20g stamp sent from Southampton to Canada 11 September 2023 but not surcharged.

f. (8 March 2024).  Supplied by RL for the postmark to be used on the other blog, this stamp is invalid and should have been surcharged at the (new since October last) rate of £5.00! - £2.50 (up from £1.10), thanks for the correction!  This is the rate for using a non-barcoded stamp.

International Women's Day slogan Cumbria Dumfries & Gallowy 05/03/2024, unsurcharged 2nd class Northern Ireland non-barcode definitive.


g. (15 July 2024!!). Supplied by TH, I at first thought it was just another postmark image, but then I looked again at the stamp!  Yes, it's a 1st class red Machin, used nearly a year after invalidation and not surcharged at all.

1st class invalid red Machin used without surcharge, July 2024.






2. Mail which has been correctly surcharged

a. My thanks to PA who provided the first example of a correctly surcharged letter posted via Gatwick Mail Centre on 10 August 2023, which has a new type of yellow 'Fee to Pay' label, inscribed 'Stamp No Longer Valid for Postage'. 


Stamp No Longer Valid for Postage 'Fee to Pay' £1.10 label on 1st class Machin definitive posted Gatwick 16 August 2023

UPDATE 22 December 2023.  Surcharge rates increased from 30 October, which means that this one caught the new rate!  

£2.50 'Stamp no longer valid', surcharge 1 November 2023 at new rate effective 30 October.



 

 

 

 

3. Mail which has been incorrectly surcharged.

a. Some confusion in southern England (Southampton Mail Centre?) where this letter to the Handwritten Letter Appreciation Society was similarly surcharged to 2a above, but with a valid 1st class Penny Black stamp - which was a commemorative, unlike the double-head stamps which are no longer valid.

1st class Penny Black stamp deemed invalid and £1.10 surcharge raised.

b. I sent this to a dealer in Birmingham on 11 August, returning the genuine Children's tv stamps that I borrowed for comparison with the forgeries.

Using a valid Decimal Wilding from the Diamond Jubilee PSB (nobody wanted these, they all wanted the Machin), not only was it surcharged it took 19 days to arrive at the conclusion that it was no longer valid!

Norvic outbound cover with 1st class (1/-) Wilding declared invalid by Birmingham Mal Centre.

c. It seems that the line at some offices is 'when in doubt surcharge it' judging by this from Sheffield Mail Centre which is wrong on all coounts.

2007 Wembley Lion 1st class definitive declared invalid and incorrectly surcharged at Sheffield or Mount Pleasant Mail Centres 8 August 2023.

d. (October 4). Another example of an incorrectly surcharged letter, this one stamped with a 1st class 1d red Smilers stamp.

1st class Penny Red Smilers stamp incorrectly surcharged either at South East Anglia or Mount Pleasant Mail Centres, 8 September 2023.

e. 8 March 2024.  This is actually a stamp that we sold for postage and the buyer used it to send an order to his buyer.  It was surcharged at the new (post 31 October 2023) rate of £5, refused, and returned but not charged.

Gummed 1st class 'Hello' stamp incorrectly charged as counterfeit at the new rate of £5.


 

 

If you have examples of any of these, or any other interesting post-invalidation covers, please send scans to the email address at the right (under 'About me').  Thanks.